- mRNA is a bioweapon - or rather can be and evidently is being used as one in some cases.
Not sure what you mean by the following but can explain my opinion:
- Covid was not a particularly dangerous disease and therefore not a poison. But the policy response to Covid was extremely dangerous and could certainly be described as "poisonous."
- Covid (propaganda and policy response) was a state operation, including the military, but not a pandemic. Covid was not a "bioweapon."
- I wouldn't say the G3P "runs" Putin. However, I would say Putin is aligned with many G3P ambitions--digital currency, digital ID, censorship of "disinformation," etc. I think there are factions within the G3P each vying for a bigger slice of the pie but no faction, including Putin's, wants to throw the pie away.
- I think some "global warming" is caused by human activity. But I don't think this is significant and natural variation (the Sun) accounts for the vast bulk of it. I don't think "radiative forcing" (AGW theory) stacks up. Most importantly, I don't think global warming is catastrophic or indeed anything to particularly worry about. Climate change is happening all the time.
- I don't think there is any evidence for a thing called a virus that behaves as alleged by virologists. I do think there is something to be said for the science, if not the practice, of epidemiology. I am not convinced by the argument that contagion is due solely to toxic environments though I do think environment plays a significant role in ill health. So am uncertain how that mechanism works if not by transmission of "something.""
An interesting idea which seems to include only Substack writers. I was surprised to find myself and many other people I respect missing from your list but realise that it is in infancy at this stage.
Please consider adding: Celia Farber, Ivan M. Paton, Doc Ahmad Malik, James Delingpole, Tereza Coraggio, Proton Magic.
I have subscribed to some of these off and on, but could not give those answers without some significant research, unless they want to come here and provide the answers themselves, which in that case it would be wonderful.
One problem is a lot of stacks are mostly videos and it takes a lot of time to watch and to interpret them.
Maybe formulate a list of simple questions, designed to fill your boxes with answers, and then send a private message asking for responses with a view to be included in your post. I would be very happy to respond to something like that.
Well the 10 questions there I put some thought into...although the Ukraine war question is turning out to be default 'no' (unless you're Hunter Biden) and so not so useful.
The key word is 'wedge' -- questions to really divide people, but short yes/no questions. Not that the point is to divide the audience, it isn't, but to sort the responders.
That's pretty good for me, but I do think the assassination attempt on Trump was real, just a psyop, though. I believe in the germ and the terrain theories---and I don't support Trump, but, I am SOOOOO glad that Kamala didn't win!
including the definition I use for the term "virus."
He has added my responses to a revised table as of Jan. 4, 2025, including a ** related to the item about the existence of viruses.
"Filling in some of the blanks:
No, I do not support Trump.
Yes, I think the Trump assassination attempt was faked.
Yes, I think ‘viruses’ exist, because I think the definition of ‘virus’ encompasses an infinite variety of complex biological molecules (known by many other terms in addition to ‘virus’) found in the body of the living self and having biological effects that also vary across time and differ from one host to another. I can explain that in more detail, but will leave it at that for the purposes of answering this basic question.
It’s not a column in your chart yet, but No, I do not believe viruses (defined as above) cause diseases or are capable of causing diseases (including epidemics or pandemics of “communicable disease.”)
Yes, I think G3P runs Putin too.
If you wanted to add another column, “ALL vaccines are bioweapons, and all vaccines have been bioweapons since the start of the vaccination era circa 1798,” my answer to that would also be “Yes.” To elaborate briefly, I think “mRNA” is another adjectival modifier for the naming of products that have always contained foreign biological material intended to harm the recipient, and capable of doing so. To the extent I think there is anything novel about the post-2020 vaccines, I think it’s primarily the lipid carriers, which enable the unstable, heterogeneous biological material to remain stable somewhat longer after injection, and thereby reach more organs and stay in the organs longer, to do more damage before decomposition and death of the foreign matter itself."
That's a good list! I most closely align with Sasha Latypova and Mike Yeadon on those ideological questions. The longer the Ukraine war drags out (along with the others) the more I think that all sides at top are idealogically committed to its continuation. Of course if viruses don't exist what alternative theories explain what is now thought of as contagion?
Ok, since I've heard from Mike Yeadon but not Sasha, and Mike was ok with what I have down for him, I'll put you as having the same responses as his except for the question of whether you think the Trump assassination attempt was faked, which is more factual than ideological, where I put a '?' for you.
I think the alternative to virus (germ) theory is terrain theory but I only had room for 10 questions 🤷
Let me know if you want me to change anything, I'll be happy to. Thanks!
Thanks. I just added Tim Berners-Lee but I think there may still be room for one more and it can still fit on a page, so I'll add you later today and let you know :)
**from Iain Davis:
"Yes to the following:
- Fake trump assassination
- mRNA is a bioweapon - or rather can be and evidently is being used as one in some cases.
Not sure what you mean by the following but can explain my opinion:
- Covid was not a particularly dangerous disease and therefore not a poison. But the policy response to Covid was extremely dangerous and could certainly be described as "poisonous."
- Covid (propaganda and policy response) was a state operation, including the military, but not a pandemic. Covid was not a "bioweapon."
- I wouldn't say the G3P "runs" Putin. However, I would say Putin is aligned with many G3P ambitions--digital currency, digital ID, censorship of "disinformation," etc. I think there are factions within the G3P each vying for a bigger slice of the pie but no faction, including Putin's, wants to throw the pie away.
- I think some "global warming" is caused by human activity. But I don't think this is significant and natural variation (the Sun) accounts for the vast bulk of it. I don't think "radiative forcing" (AGW theory) stacks up. Most importantly, I don't think global warming is catastrophic or indeed anything to particularly worry about. Climate change is happening all the time.
- I don't think there is any evidence for a thing called a virus that behaves as alleged by virologists. I do think there is something to be said for the science, if not the practice, of epidemiology. I am not convinced by the argument that contagion is due solely to toxic environments though I do think environment plays a significant role in ill health. So am uncertain how that mechanism works if not by transmission of "something.""
An interesting idea which seems to include only Substack writers. I was surprised to find myself and many other people I respect missing from your list but realise that it is in infancy at this stage.
Please consider adding: Celia Farber, Ivan M. Paton, Doc Ahmad Malik, James Delingpole, Tereza Coraggio, Proton Magic.
I have subscribed to some of these off and on, but could not give those answers without some significant research, unless they want to come here and provide the answers themselves, which in that case it would be wonderful.
One problem is a lot of stacks are mostly videos and it takes a lot of time to watch and to interpret them.
Maybe formulate a list of simple questions, designed to fill your boxes with answers, and then send a private message asking for responses with a view to be included in your post. I would be very happy to respond to something like that.
Well the 10 questions there I put some thought into...although the Ukraine war question is turning out to be default 'no' (unless you're Hunter Biden) and so not so useful.
The key word is 'wedge' -- questions to really divide people, but short yes/no questions. Not that the point is to divide the audience, it isn't, but to sort the responders.
That's pretty good for me, but I do think the assassination attempt on Trump was real, just a psyop, though. I believe in the germ and the terrain theories---and I don't support Trump, but, I am SOOOOO glad that Kamala didn't win!
and I am not sure what G3P is.
Thanks for responding. I will try to fix it up so you're happy with it. I may not get to it tonight though 😁
About the G3P:
Organizational Chart, Bank for International Settlements Kill Box
Organizational chart by Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic and What is the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)?
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/organizational-chart-bank-for-international
ok so I changed:
supports Trump: ? to no
Trump assassination faked: yes to ?
viruses exist: ? to yes
G3P is in charge: yes to ?
Sorry for the mix up. Let me know if it needs more changes.
Thanks for the feedback and Happy New Year!
**After Tommy tagged me on an earlier version of this table, I offered him some clarifications,
https://substack.com/@bailiwicknews/note/c-84405157
including the definition I use for the term "virus."
He has added my responses to a revised table as of Jan. 4, 2025, including a ** related to the item about the existence of viruses.
"Filling in some of the blanks:
No, I do not support Trump.
Yes, I think the Trump assassination attempt was faked.
Yes, I think ‘viruses’ exist, because I think the definition of ‘virus’ encompasses an infinite variety of complex biological molecules (known by many other terms in addition to ‘virus’) found in the body of the living self and having biological effects that also vary across time and differ from one host to another. I can explain that in more detail, but will leave it at that for the purposes of answering this basic question.
It’s not a column in your chart yet, but No, I do not believe viruses (defined as above) cause diseases or are capable of causing diseases (including epidemics or pandemics of “communicable disease.”)
Yes, I think G3P runs Putin too.
If you wanted to add another column, “ALL vaccines are bioweapons, and all vaccines have been bioweapons since the start of the vaccination era circa 1798,” my answer to that would also be “Yes.” To elaborate briefly, I think “mRNA” is another adjectival modifier for the naming of products that have always contained foreign biological material intended to harm the recipient, and capable of doing so. To the extent I think there is anything novel about the post-2020 vaccines, I think it’s primarily the lipid carriers, which enable the unstable, heterogeneous biological material to remain stable somewhat longer after injection, and thereby reach more organs and stay in the organs longer, to do more damage before decomposition and death of the foreign matter itself."
Tommy,
I didn’t know what G3P was but now that I do, please amend the ? marks to Y.
Thank you,
Mike
Will do, thanks!
✅
That's a good list! I most closely align with Sasha Latypova and Mike Yeadon on those ideological questions. The longer the Ukraine war drags out (along with the others) the more I think that all sides at top are idealogically committed to its continuation. Of course if viruses don't exist what alternative theories explain what is now thought of as contagion?
Ok, since I've heard from Mike Yeadon but not Sasha, and Mike was ok with what I have down for him, I'll put you as having the same responses as his except for the question of whether you think the Trump assassination attempt was faked, which is more factual than ideological, where I put a '?' for you.
I think the alternative to virus (germ) theory is terrain theory but I only had room for 10 questions 🤷
Let me know if you want me to change anything, I'll be happy to. Thanks!
Thanks. I just added Tim Berners-Lee but I think there may still be room for one more and it can still fit on a page, so I'll add you later today and let you know :)
Does mRNA even really exist ?
What about 5G as that is intrinsic with CovID performance ?
Maybe chemical deposits via planes is also good question to add, as chemtrail exitance awareness ?
Also is the Earth 'a definite topology that we can prove as globe or otherwise' is fascinating lynchpin of aware thinking.
Hey YAT!
Here's what Mr. Ehret vector would look like according to me, as an audience member:
No, Yes, Yes, No, Yes, Yes, and No to the last four columns.
But most of those questions he will never admit publicly. Some public speakers are like that, ambiguous and mysterious about everything.
Please consider formatting the table so that the odd rows have a different color than the even rows. That helps sometimes.
Thanks for the suggestions.
If you can cite where Matt Ehret wrote or spoke (hour and minute please) those answers, then I can see about using them.
Sounds interesting about a different color for odd rows, I'll consider that.
Add David Martin?
He is hereby invited to come here and add his answers in the comments.