- mRNA is a bioweapon - or rather can be and evidently is being used as one in some cases.
Not sure what you mean by the following but can explain my opinion:
- Covid was not a particularly dangerous disease and therefore not a poison. But the policy response to Covid was extremely dangerous and could certainly be described as "poisonous."
- Covid (propaganda and policy response) was a state operation, including the military, but not a pandemic. Covid was not a "bioweapon."
- I wouldn't say the G3P "runs" Putin. However, I would say Putin is aligned with many G3P ambitions--digital currency, digital ID, censorship of "disinformation," etc. I think there are factions within the G3P each vying for a bigger slice of the pie but no faction, including Putin's, wants to throw the pie away.
- I think some "global warming" is caused by human activity. But I don't think this is significant and natural variation (the Sun) accounts for the vast bulk of it. I don't think "radiative forcing" (AGW theory) stacks up. Most importantly, I don't think global warming is catastrophic or indeed anything to particularly worry about. Climate change is happening all the time.
- I don't think there is any evidence for a thing called a virus that behaves as alleged by virologists. I do think there is something to be said for the science, if not the practice, of epidemiology. I am not convinced by the argument that contagion is due solely to toxic environments though I do think environment plays a significant role in ill health. So am uncertain how that mechanism works if not by transmission of "something.""
An interesting idea which seems to include only Substack writers. I was surprised to find myself and many other people I respect missing from your list but realise that it is in infancy at this stage.
Please consider adding: Celia Farber, Ivan M. Paton, Doc Ahmad Malik, James Delingpole, Tereza Coraggio, Proton Magic.
**from Iain Davis:
"Yes to the following:
- Fake trump assassination
- mRNA is a bioweapon - or rather can be and evidently is being used as one in some cases.
Not sure what you mean by the following but can explain my opinion:
- Covid was not a particularly dangerous disease and therefore not a poison. But the policy response to Covid was extremely dangerous and could certainly be described as "poisonous."
- Covid (propaganda and policy response) was a state operation, including the military, but not a pandemic. Covid was not a "bioweapon."
- I wouldn't say the G3P "runs" Putin. However, I would say Putin is aligned with many G3P ambitions--digital currency, digital ID, censorship of "disinformation," etc. I think there are factions within the G3P each vying for a bigger slice of the pie but no faction, including Putin's, wants to throw the pie away.
- I think some "global warming" is caused by human activity. But I don't think this is significant and natural variation (the Sun) accounts for the vast bulk of it. I don't think "radiative forcing" (AGW theory) stacks up. Most importantly, I don't think global warming is catastrophic or indeed anything to particularly worry about. Climate change is happening all the time.
- I don't think there is any evidence for a thing called a virus that behaves as alleged by virologists. I do think there is something to be said for the science, if not the practice, of epidemiology. I am not convinced by the argument that contagion is due solely to toxic environments though I do think environment plays a significant role in ill health. So am uncertain how that mechanism works if not by transmission of "something.""
An interesting idea which seems to include only Substack writers. I was surprised to find myself and many other people I respect missing from your list but realise that it is in infancy at this stage.
Please consider adding: Celia Farber, Ivan M. Paton, Doc Ahmad Malik, James Delingpole, Tereza Coraggio, Proton Magic.