Note: for anyone who is a respondent in the table, your row can be filled out by entering a comment using the following template with answers of <yes/ yes (see comments) / no / no (see comments) / ?> where any comments can be here in the comments section, then I will put your answers in the table. Thank you for participating! --YAT
These questions follow the Open World Assumption:
"The Open World Assumption (OWA) is the assumption that what is not known to be true or false might be true, or absence of information is interpreted as unknown information, not as negative information"
So an assertion of one thing in the list does not negate the assertion of another thing. People will have different interpretations of different things.
Be careful not to wait too long, or I might enter guesses for your answers!
Oh crikey! That did escape my attention! OK - wow 24 questions??... this is very awkward. I need two copies of the post and have to keep swapping between the two!
🤣😂Ain't nobody got time for this!🤣😂
7) NO Covid was not just poisoning
8) NO Covid was not a military action
9) YES Covid was dangerous
10) YES Covid response was dangerous
11) NO Covid was not a pandemic
12) YES Covid was type of bioweapon - 5G
13) NO viruses do not exist
14) NO viruses do not cause disease
15) YES Terrain theory is correct
16) NO Germ theory is not correct
17) NO G3P is not in charge
18) NO G3P does not 'run' Putin.
19) NO Global warming is not caused by humans
20) NO I do not support ANY war
21) YES 5G is for depop + surveillance + IoT + Great Reset + 4th Industrial Revolution
22) YES Chemtrails are for depop + destruction of all natural life
3. Trump is a technocrat – No, if defined as a technical expert.
4. mRNA is a bioweapon – It has allegedly been used in a bioweapon construct, but mRNA also an essential molecule in all cells of all life on earth. Concerns about modified mRNA in Covid injections include continuous translation of spike protein fragments in variable amounts for unknown durations, as well as ancillary problems such as wide biodistribution by lipid nanoparticles and inclusion in vials of DNA plasmids and SV40 promoters.
5. All vaccines are bioweapons – Not necessarily, but this potential is suggested by coercion, mandates, vaccine passports, disallowance of personal belief exemptions (such as in California’s school vaccine mandates), hidden trial results, adverse events concealment, no data transparency, and recommended use in pregnant women and children despite regulatory agencies’ admitted lack of adequate public safety testing.
Some vaccines are established bioweapons, such as the WHO’s tetanus program (apparently funded by Bill Gates) in Kenya that combined tetanus toxoid with HCG to sterilize women in Kenya without their knowledge or consent, according to Kenyan officials.
6. Vaccines were always bioweapons – Same answer as 5.
7. Covid was just poisoning – Not “just.” It was much more.
8. Covid was a military operation - Yes
9. Covid was dangerous - Yes.
10. Covid response was dangerous - Yes.
11. Covid was a pandemic – Yes, if defined as a rapid increase in number of disease cases with spread across regional borders.
An increase in all-cause mortality is not a necessary part of this definition.
If an intelligence agency sprayed the virus in cities such as New York and Sydney, this definition can still be met.
Note, however, pandemics can be and have been “faked,” according to RFK Jr., referring to Fauci, Farrar, and Gates.
12. Covid was a bioweapon - Yes
13. Viruses exist - Yes
14. Viruses cause disease - Yes
15. Terrain theory is correct – No, to the extent this theory posits microorganisms cannot cause disease.
16. Germ theory is correct - Yes, to the extent this theory posits microorganisms can cause disease.
17. G3P is in charge – Perhaps whoever runs G3P is in charge.
22. Chemtrails are for depopulation – Not necessarily, but the components allegedly found in chemtrails, such as barium, might be used to harm people and livestock.
3. Trump is a technocrat - Yes, and other things too.
4. mRNA is a bioweapon - Yes
5. All vaccines are bioweapons - Yes
6. Vaccines were always bioweapons - Yes
7. Covid was just poisoning - Yes
8. Covid was a military operation - Yes
9. Covid was dangerous - Yes. Deceit and poisoning are harmful.
10. Covid response was dangerous - Yes. Deceit and poisoning are harmful.
11. Covid was a pandemic - No
12. Covid was a bioweapon - Yes, and psychological deceit operation.
13. Viruses exist - Yes, if 'virus' defined as infinite variety of unstable/dynamic biologically-active substances produced by living organisms. [No if defined as stable, transmissible disease-causing agents.]
14. Viruses cause disease - No. See response to 13, above and my other writing on the subject.
15. Terrain theory is correct - No position. Awaiting further development of hypotheses and evidence. My distrust of available definitions, scientific papers and concern about intentionally-misleading information are high.
16. Germ theory is correct - No position. Awaiting further development of hypotheses and evidence. My distrust of available definitions, scientific papers and concern about intentionally-misleading information are high.
17. G3P is in charge - Yes
18. G3P runs Putin too - Yes
19. Global warming caused by humans - No.
I don't think global warming is a real thing. Re: global warming and weather control theory: I don't think TPTB control the weather as much as I think they control public perception of weather, and management (long-planned exploitation) of mostly natural disasters that they can predict (broadly speaking) may -- within margins of probability -- hit each place on earth. For example, I think they can start fires in dry areas, if the areas are dry, just as any arsonist can, but they probably have better equipment for starting more fires, faster, hotter and more selectively in more locations throughout a dry region simultaneously (i.e. Paradise, Lahaina, Palisades, directed-energy weapons etc.). I think they can arrange mass poisonings, chemical sprays, chemical spills, chemical plant explosions (i.e. East Palestine, Atlanta...) and vaccination campaigns, and they can arrange the false attribution of resulting biological effects (sickness) to illusory/false causes other than chemical poisonings (such as transmissible viruses). They can arrange demolition of skyscrapers, bridges, planes, dams and levees. They can send mercenaries into flood and fire ravaged areas after floods happen and block people from mutual support and recovery and drive people off their land and seize land, homes and businesses. I think they can and have identified (decades ago, long before any specific disaster strikes), what they will do in every inhabited place, during and after the disaster hits, to weaken and kill survivors, drive survivors away, snap up real property and prevent resettlement. But I don't think they can conjure rainfall or hurricanes, or withhold rainfall that would otherwise happen (so as to conjure drought.) I think they want people to think they have those techniques. But I don't think they really have them. I think it's another example of projected illusions to deflect attention from traditional and DEW arson, demolition, chemical poisoning, looting and other forms of intentional destruction and exploitation of post-disaster chaos. ADDITION Jan. 13, 2025: And they can arrange the false attribution of the fires to drought, high winds, too much dried out vegetation, too much human population, global warming, etc.
20. Supports Ukraine war - No
21. 5G is for depopulation - Undecided, leaning No.
I tend to think 5G, 4G, 3G and other (novel or renamed old) EMF sources are useful for 1) wasting human time and material resources (construction projects with no real benefit or improvement over existing tech); 2) frightening people/inducing sense of helplessness about potential sources of harm they cannot readily see or avoid; and 3) deflecting attention away from global theft (looting/hoarding of land and resources) and from chemical poisoning (drugs, low-altitude outdoor and indoor/interior-of-building sprays, derailments, explosions) and vaccination as primary causes of sickness.
22. Chemtrails are for depopulation - Undecided, leaning No.
I tend to think high-altitude chemtrails are possibly spraying seawater in most cases and useful for 1) wasting human time and material resources (aviation planes, drones, fuels); 2) scaring people/inducing sense of helplessness about potential sources of harm they can readily see but cannot readily avoid; 3) making the act of looking up into the sky become psychologically distressing rather than joyful, reassuring, calming and/or reverent; and 4) deflecting attention from global theft (looting/hoarding of land and resources) and from chemical poisoning (drugs, low-altitude or surface outdoor and indoor/interior-of-building sprays, derailments, explosions) and vaccination as primary causes of sickness.
23. Malthus was correct - No.
24. The Earth is overpopulated - No, and population and land/resource use/carrying-capacity data are just as false as all other centrally-controlled data.
I'm not a «well-known commentator» but here you go:
-
Supports Trump: partially
Trump assassination attempt faked: no
Trump is a technocrat: yes
mRNA is a bioweapon: no
All vaccines are bioweapons: no
Vaccines were always bioweapons: no
Covid was just poisoning: partially
Covid was a military operation: partially
Covid was dangerous: no
Covid response was dangerous: yes
Covid was a pandemic: yes
Covid was a bioweapon: partially
Viruses exist: yes
Viruses cause disease: partially
Terrain theory is correct: partially
Germ theory is correct: partially
G3P is in charge: partially
G3P runs Putin, too: no
Global warming caused by humans: no
Supports Ukraine war: no
5G is for depopulation: no
Chemtrails are for depopulation: no
Malthus was correct: no
The Earth is overpopulated: no
-
Some comments:
- I believe one of the biggest issues in public discussion these days is many folks' inability to distinguish between necessary cause and sufficient cause.
- I subscribe to the «viruses are just pieces of trash» which means their presence can shape the course of disease but in most cases aren't sufficient to cause it.
- I believe covid was a mostly unsuccessful attempt to create a bioweapon, and the overreaction was caused in large part by Wuhan folks overreporting their success.
- and most importantly, I believe most humans don't see very far. ;)
Interesting - I have thought about a similar survey for some time and I am not surprised at the disagreements - the terrain/germ argument particularly divisive in recent years. Two areas of thought arise. One is that I personally no longer adhere to a binary yes/no view of reality - I think there is great wisdom in acknowledging what we do not know, especially considering how questionable all efforts at objectification of knowledge are becoming. I tend to hold some kind of internal moving chart of probabilities for each of your questions.
Whether the Trump assassinations were faked is by itself a gigantic rabbit hole - if faked, there were a couple elements that were very well executed (bullet richochets and the cherry picker deflating on cue, for starters). If real, there were elements that sure seemed extremely fake - the lack of protection during the most iconic "fight" photo op of all time, the visible running-around of the assassin on the roof, the misspelling of Comperatore's jacket, and many more anomalies. I lean pretty hard (75%) that it was faked, but why should I be dogmatic about something I don't really know?
These events, and options for their subsequent spin and follow-up events, are probably being generated by very sophisticated programs, which seem more and more to be programming not only plausible deniability but its close cousin indeterminacy into the event itself. What about Sandy Hook and 9/11 by the way, also huge events even the most awake people seem to disagree about?
All of these need unpacking and a subtle approach that takes into account the limits of what we know and how we know things (epistemology). This is the second area of thoughts I would respond with - the limitations of our language itself. I often find increased clarity by distinguishing the map (language) from the territory (event/experience) being considered. Both terrain theory and germ theory are maps imposed by human intellect upon a huge set of dynamics involved with life on Earth. Terrain theory is obviously more holistic and comprehensive, while germ theory arises from the scientific initiative to isolate single causative mechanisms to disease. Epistemology can at least point a way forward by which we can understand the worldviews that lead toward each approach, and what may arise from their pursuit. I for one think the terrain theory is overwhelmingly more important, but I do not need to invalidate germ theory to do so, just to put it in it rightful place. The entire human endeavor of phenomenal objectification the last few hundred years, scientific materialism, is a double blind experiment leading to tremendous distortions in reality perception that are sometimes useful, but for the most part increasingly disastrous.
Thanks for the space and prompt for my own further work - really helpful!
Be careful not to wait too long, or I might enter guesses for your answers!
1) Supports Trump Y
2) Trump assassination attempt faked N
3) Trump is a Technocrat ?
4) mRNA is a bioweapon. It is poison
5)All vaccines are bioweapons. Each has its own risk-benefit equation and would you ask are all drugs bioweapons? They should not be lumped together as each is very different from the rest and some people need some.
6) Vaccines were always bioweapons N
7) Covid was just poisoning. It was much more than that
8) Covid was a military operation. Military-political
9) Covid was dangerous. The virus killed people and the vaccine was even worse
10) Covid response was dangerous. Y
11) Covid was a pandemic. Depends on definition but yes it was an infectious disease that spread widely
12) Covid was a bioweapon. Probably SARS-CoV-2 was designed as a bioweapon
13) Viruses exist. Y
14) Viruses cause disease. Y
15) Terrain theory is correct. It is part of what needs to be considered
16) Germ theory is correct. Same
17) G3P is in charge
18) G3P runs Putin too
19) Global warming caused by humans. Not much
20) Supports Ukraine war. proxy war and resource war, so N
21) 5G is for depopulation ?
22) Chemtrails are for depopulation. Unclear what this is for
from Cindy Sheehan (just moved this out from the pinned comment)
1) Supports Trump NO
2) Trump assassination attempt faked NO
3) Trump is a Technocrat NO
4) mRNA is a bioweapon YES
5)All vaccines are bioweapons PROBABLY
6) Vaccines were always bioweapons PROBABLY
7) Covid was just poisoning ?
8) Covid was a military operation PROBABLY
9) Covid was dangerous NO
10) Covid response was dangerous YES
11) Covid was a pandemic NO
12) Covid was a bioweapon MAYBE
13) Viruses exist MAYBE
14) Viruses cause disease MAYBE
15) Terrain theory is correct MAYBE
16) Germ theory is correct MAYBE
17) G3P is in charge MAYBE
18) G3P runs Putin too ?
19) Global warming caused by humans SMALL PART
20) Supports Ukraine war NO
21) 5G is for depopulation YES
22) Chemtrails are for depopulation MAYBE
23) Malthus was correct NO
24) The Earth is overpopulated NO
I am conflicted, because, I am usually not an either/or; yes/no; person. There are many nuances. For example the chemtrail thing. I think it's for weather control that can have a big impact on the population. But directly? I don't think so.
1-3 - I neither "support" nor "don't support" Trump, I believe he is an unprincipled liar.
I find it is futile to exert my mind or emotions on figuring out the moves of an unprincipled liar. He will do whatever he is paid to do at that point in time as someone offers a better deal. So "support/non-support" is an exercise of guessing who is paying him for what when.
4-8 yes
9 - no
10- yes
11 - no
12 - no, but some chemical weapons were probably used, at least in some places
13- I don't care, it's a matter of personal beliefs
14 - no
15 - 16 - A "theory" is never "correct". It's a hypothesis that requires continuous investigation. I can say correct/incorrect about some specific claim/experiment. By the way, we are in the fking mess that we are because a group of people decided that some scientific theories were "correct" and therefore "settled".
17-18 I don't know what G3P means. My opinion on Putin is the same as my opinion on Trump.
19 - 22 no
23 - technically, yes, but nobody who talks about Malthus today actually read Malthus. I suggest that you read his essay on population. He did not say anything about overpopulation, nor projected an overpopulation of the Earth.
I just recently became aware of your Newsletter and this questionnaire. I have a number of questions and some comments that I think it is best to place in separate responses. Here's one that is apropos to the above:
Would it be correct to say that what you refer to as G3P is another term for Globalist Cabal, (what Catherine Austin Fitts refers to as "Mr. Global.")? Other terms for Globalist Cabal (Globalist in short-hand) include Illuminati or Deep State, although the latter usually refers to those within a country who carry out the orders of unseen/unknown Globalists, but it can refer to the aggregate entity as well).
"The Open World Assumption (OWA) is the assumption that what is not known to be true or false might be true, or absence of information is interpreted as unknown information, not as negative information"
So an assertion of one thing in the list does not negate the assertion of another thing. People will have different interpretations of different things.
Its a problem updating the questions because the respondents seem already to be nervous about committing themselves to answers, even though the Open World Assumption is used for the answers as explained in the instructions.
I would like to see you define what you mean by Technocrat. For example, one of the questions asks if DJT is a technocrat. I could see asking if he is a globalist which is not necessarily the same thing, although technocracy and the use of advanced forms of technology are clearly part of the means that Globalists utilize in achieving their goals.
Note: for anyone who is a respondent in the table, your row can be filled out by entering a comment using the following template with answers of <yes/ yes (see comments) / no / no (see comments) / ?> where any comments can be here in the comments section, then I will put your answers in the table. Thank you for participating! --YAT
These questions follow the Open World Assumption:
"The Open World Assumption (OWA) is the assumption that what is not known to be true or false might be true, or absence of information is interpreted as unknown information, not as negative information"
So an assertion of one thing in the list does not negate the assertion of another thing. People will have different interpretations of different things.
Be careful not to wait too long, or I might enter guesses for your answers!
1) Supports Trump
2) Trump assassination attempt faked
3) Trump is a Technocrat
4) mRNA is a bioweapon
5)All vaccines are bioweapons
6) Vaccines were always bioweapons
7) Covid was just poisoning
8) Covid was a military operation
9) Covid was dangerous
10) Covid response was dangerous
11) Covid was a pandemic
12) Covid was a bioweapon
13) Viruses exist
14) Viruses cause disease
15) Terrain theory is correct
16) Germ theory is correct
17) G3P is in charge
18) G3P runs Putin too
19) Global warming caused by humans
20) Supports Ukraine war
21) 5G is for depopulation
22) Chemtrails are for depopulation
23) Malthus was correct
24) The Earth is overpopulated
To assist you I have restacked and tagged some of the people whose data is unknown so far.
Here is mine:
1) I do not support Trump
2) I think the assassination attempts were faked.
3) Trump is a technocrat.
4) mRNA is a bio-weapon
5) All vaccines are bio-weapons
6) Not sure
Thanks for expanding your project to include a wider variety of Substackers. Much appreciated. xx
Datawrapper doesn't make the horizontal scroll obvious. There are a lot more questions 😁
Thank you! I will add it.
-Oh- I was worried people wouldn't see that they can scroll the questions, please try if you didn't see that.
Oh crikey! That did escape my attention! OK - wow 24 questions??... this is very awkward. I need two copies of the post and have to keep swapping between the two!
🤣😂Ain't nobody got time for this!🤣😂
7) NO Covid was not just poisoning
8) NO Covid was not a military action
9) YES Covid was dangerous
10) YES Covid response was dangerous
11) NO Covid was not a pandemic
12) YES Covid was type of bioweapon - 5G
13) NO viruses do not exist
14) NO viruses do not cause disease
15) YES Terrain theory is correct
16) NO Germ theory is not correct
17) NO G3P is not in charge
18) NO G3P does not 'run' Putin.
19) NO Global warming is not caused by humans
20) NO I do not support ANY war
21) YES 5G is for depop + surveillance + IoT + Great Reset + 4th Industrial Revolution
22) YES Chemtrails are for depop + destruction of all natural life
23) NO Malthus was very short sighted!
24) NO the earth is not over-populated
🙏🙏🙏 Thank you!
You can see why I'm limiting it to a few people.
more people can always be added later
one at a time 😁
It is a lot bigger than I realised!
updated ✅
Note: relevant comments will be copied over from previous version, which is at https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/opinions-on-wedge-issues
My name isn't on it?
not sure what you mean, but I added
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/more-opinions-on-wedge-issues/comment/85674538
which seemed the only relevant thing from the previous post. You can always just add more comments here.
If you don't see your row on the first page, go to page 2.
Hey Tommy,
1. Supports Trump - Yes on some things, like deporting criminal invaders. No on other things, such as trouncing the First Amendment.
2. Trump assassination attempt faked – Yes, see https://hillmd.substack.com/p/seven-signs-trumps-assassination
3. Trump is a technocrat – No, if defined as a technical expert.
4. mRNA is a bioweapon – It has allegedly been used in a bioweapon construct, but mRNA also an essential molecule in all cells of all life on earth. Concerns about modified mRNA in Covid injections include continuous translation of spike protein fragments in variable amounts for unknown durations, as well as ancillary problems such as wide biodistribution by lipid nanoparticles and inclusion in vials of DNA plasmids and SV40 promoters.
5. All vaccines are bioweapons – Not necessarily, but this potential is suggested by coercion, mandates, vaccine passports, disallowance of personal belief exemptions (such as in California’s school vaccine mandates), hidden trial results, adverse events concealment, no data transparency, and recommended use in pregnant women and children despite regulatory agencies’ admitted lack of adequate public safety testing.
Some vaccines are established bioweapons, such as the WHO’s tetanus program (apparently funded by Bill Gates) in Kenya that combined tetanus toxoid with HCG to sterilize women in Kenya without their knowledge or consent, according to Kenyan officials.
6. Vaccines were always bioweapons – Same answer as 5.
7. Covid was just poisoning – Not “just.” It was much more.
8. Covid was a military operation - Yes
9. Covid was dangerous - Yes.
10. Covid response was dangerous - Yes.
11. Covid was a pandemic – Yes, if defined as a rapid increase in number of disease cases with spread across regional borders.
An increase in all-cause mortality is not a necessary part of this definition.
If an intelligence agency sprayed the virus in cities such as New York and Sydney, this definition can still be met.
Note, however, pandemics can be and have been “faked,” according to RFK Jr., referring to Fauci, Farrar, and Gates.
12. Covid was a bioweapon - Yes
13. Viruses exist - Yes
14. Viruses cause disease - Yes
15. Terrain theory is correct – No, to the extent this theory posits microorganisms cannot cause disease.
16. Germ theory is correct - Yes, to the extent this theory posits microorganisms can cause disease.
17. G3P is in charge – Perhaps whoever runs G3P is in charge.
18. G3P runs Putin too - Perhaps whoever runs G3P runs him.
19. Global warming caused by humans – Not significantly, only a trivial amount, per MIT’s Richard Lindzen PhD, others.
20. Supports Ukraine war - No
21. 5G is for depopulation – Not its main use, but it can be used to harm through phased array transmitters in combination with, e.g., metal particles in people. See https://hillmd.substack.com/p/metals-in-vaccines-enable-5g-killings
22. Chemtrails are for depopulation – Not necessarily, but the components allegedly found in chemtrails, such as barium, might be used to harm people and livestock.
23. Malthus was correct - No
24. The Earth is overpopulated - No
Awesome, thank you!!
✅
You’re welcome, Tommy.
Thank you for gathering opinions.
1. Supports Trump - No, but prays for him.
2. Trump assassination attempt faked - Yes
3. Trump is a technocrat - Yes, and other things too.
4. mRNA is a bioweapon - Yes
5. All vaccines are bioweapons - Yes
6. Vaccines were always bioweapons - Yes
7. Covid was just poisoning - Yes
8. Covid was a military operation - Yes
9. Covid was dangerous - Yes. Deceit and poisoning are harmful.
10. Covid response was dangerous - Yes. Deceit and poisoning are harmful.
11. Covid was a pandemic - No
12. Covid was a bioweapon - Yes, and psychological deceit operation.
13. Viruses exist - Yes, if 'virus' defined as infinite variety of unstable/dynamic biologically-active substances produced by living organisms. [No if defined as stable, transmissible disease-causing agents.]
14. Viruses cause disease - No. See response to 13, above and my other writing on the subject.
15. Terrain theory is correct - No position. Awaiting further development of hypotheses and evidence. My distrust of available definitions, scientific papers and concern about intentionally-misleading information are high.
16. Germ theory is correct - No position. Awaiting further development of hypotheses and evidence. My distrust of available definitions, scientific papers and concern about intentionally-misleading information are high.
17. G3P is in charge - Yes
18. G3P runs Putin too - Yes
19. Global warming caused by humans - No.
I don't think global warming is a real thing. Re: global warming and weather control theory: I don't think TPTB control the weather as much as I think they control public perception of weather, and management (long-planned exploitation) of mostly natural disasters that they can predict (broadly speaking) may -- within margins of probability -- hit each place on earth. For example, I think they can start fires in dry areas, if the areas are dry, just as any arsonist can, but they probably have better equipment for starting more fires, faster, hotter and more selectively in more locations throughout a dry region simultaneously (i.e. Paradise, Lahaina, Palisades, directed-energy weapons etc.). I think they can arrange mass poisonings, chemical sprays, chemical spills, chemical plant explosions (i.e. East Palestine, Atlanta...) and vaccination campaigns, and they can arrange the false attribution of resulting biological effects (sickness) to illusory/false causes other than chemical poisonings (such as transmissible viruses). They can arrange demolition of skyscrapers, bridges, planes, dams and levees. They can send mercenaries into flood and fire ravaged areas after floods happen and block people from mutual support and recovery and drive people off their land and seize land, homes and businesses. I think they can and have identified (decades ago, long before any specific disaster strikes), what they will do in every inhabited place, during and after the disaster hits, to weaken and kill survivors, drive survivors away, snap up real property and prevent resettlement. But I don't think they can conjure rainfall or hurricanes, or withhold rainfall that would otherwise happen (so as to conjure drought.) I think they want people to think they have those techniques. But I don't think they really have them. I think it's another example of projected illusions to deflect attention from traditional and DEW arson, demolition, chemical poisoning, looting and other forms of intentional destruction and exploitation of post-disaster chaos. ADDITION Jan. 13, 2025: And they can arrange the false attribution of the fires to drought, high winds, too much dried out vegetation, too much human population, global warming, etc.
20. Supports Ukraine war - No
21. 5G is for depopulation - Undecided, leaning No.
I tend to think 5G, 4G, 3G and other (novel or renamed old) EMF sources are useful for 1) wasting human time and material resources (construction projects with no real benefit or improvement over existing tech); 2) frightening people/inducing sense of helplessness about potential sources of harm they cannot readily see or avoid; and 3) deflecting attention away from global theft (looting/hoarding of land and resources) and from chemical poisoning (drugs, low-altitude outdoor and indoor/interior-of-building sprays, derailments, explosions) and vaccination as primary causes of sickness.
22. Chemtrails are for depopulation - Undecided, leaning No.
I tend to think high-altitude chemtrails are possibly spraying seawater in most cases and useful for 1) wasting human time and material resources (aviation planes, drones, fuels); 2) scaring people/inducing sense of helplessness about potential sources of harm they can readily see but cannot readily avoid; 3) making the act of looking up into the sky become psychologically distressing rather than joyful, reassuring, calming and/or reverent; and 4) deflecting attention from global theft (looting/hoarding of land and resources) and from chemical poisoning (drugs, low-altitude or surface outdoor and indoor/interior-of-building sprays, derailments, explosions) and vaccination as primary causes of sickness.
23. Malthus was correct - No.
24. The Earth is overpopulated - No, and population and land/resource use/carrying-capacity data are just as false as all other centrally-controlled data.
Thank you Katherine!! 🙏🙏🙏
✅
You're welcome! Thank you for putting the project together.
I'm not a «well-known commentator» but here you go:
-
Supports Trump: partially
Trump assassination attempt faked: no
Trump is a technocrat: yes
mRNA is a bioweapon: no
All vaccines are bioweapons: no
Vaccines were always bioweapons: no
Covid was just poisoning: partially
Covid was a military operation: partially
Covid was dangerous: no
Covid response was dangerous: yes
Covid was a pandemic: yes
Covid was a bioweapon: partially
Viruses exist: yes
Viruses cause disease: partially
Terrain theory is correct: partially
Germ theory is correct: partially
G3P is in charge: partially
G3P runs Putin, too: no
Global warming caused by humans: no
Supports Ukraine war: no
5G is for depopulation: no
Chemtrails are for depopulation: no
Malthus was correct: no
The Earth is overpopulated: no
-
Some comments:
- I believe one of the biggest issues in public discussion these days is many folks' inability to distinguish between necessary cause and sufficient cause.
- I subscribe to the «viruses are just pieces of trash» which means their presence can shape the course of disease but in most cases aren't sufficient to cause it.
- I believe covid was a mostly unsuccessful attempt to create a bioweapon, and the overreaction was caused in large part by Wuhan folks overreporting their success.
- and most importantly, I believe most humans don't see very far. ;)
Added ✅
Thank you Rat!!
"I'm not a «well-known commentator»"
oh but I found you on Bill Rice Jr's list
I will add your row tomorrow.
Well, I volunteered there, too. :)
1) Supports Trump --- no
2) Trump assassination attempt faked --- Probably
3) Trump is a Technocrat --- yes
4) mRNA is a bioweapon --- yes
5)All vaccines are bioweapons --- Probably
6) Vaccines were always bioweapons --- Probably
7) Covid was just poisoning --- Probably
8) Covid was a military operation --- yes
9) Covid was dangerous --- no
10) Covid response was dangerous --- Yes
11) Covid was a pandemic --- no
12) Covid was a bioweapon --- yes
13) Viruses exist --- Not with contagion as an element
14) Viruses cause disease --- No
15) Terrain theory is correct --- Yes
16) Germ theory is correct --- No
17) G3P is in charge --- Probably
18) G3P runs Putin too --- Not sure
19) Global warming caused by humans --- no
20) Supports Ukraine war --- no
21) 5G is for depopulation --- yes
22) Chemtrails are for depopulation --- probably
23) Malthus was correct --- no!
24) The Earth is overpopulated --- no!
Thank you Amy!! 🙏🙏🙏
✅
Interesting - I have thought about a similar survey for some time and I am not surprised at the disagreements - the terrain/germ argument particularly divisive in recent years. Two areas of thought arise. One is that I personally no longer adhere to a binary yes/no view of reality - I think there is great wisdom in acknowledging what we do not know, especially considering how questionable all efforts at objectification of knowledge are becoming. I tend to hold some kind of internal moving chart of probabilities for each of your questions.
Whether the Trump assassinations were faked is by itself a gigantic rabbit hole - if faked, there were a couple elements that were very well executed (bullet richochets and the cherry picker deflating on cue, for starters). If real, there were elements that sure seemed extremely fake - the lack of protection during the most iconic "fight" photo op of all time, the visible running-around of the assassin on the roof, the misspelling of Comperatore's jacket, and many more anomalies. I lean pretty hard (75%) that it was faked, but why should I be dogmatic about something I don't really know?
These events, and options for their subsequent spin and follow-up events, are probably being generated by very sophisticated programs, which seem more and more to be programming not only plausible deniability but its close cousin indeterminacy into the event itself. What about Sandy Hook and 9/11 by the way, also huge events even the most awake people seem to disagree about?
All of these need unpacking and a subtle approach that takes into account the limits of what we know and how we know things (epistemology). This is the second area of thoughts I would respond with - the limitations of our language itself. I often find increased clarity by distinguishing the map (language) from the territory (event/experience) being considered. Both terrain theory and germ theory are maps imposed by human intellect upon a huge set of dynamics involved with life on Earth. Terrain theory is obviously more holistic and comprehensive, while germ theory arises from the scientific initiative to isolate single causative mechanisms to disease. Epistemology can at least point a way forward by which we can understand the worldviews that lead toward each approach, and what may arise from their pursuit. I for one think the terrain theory is overwhelmingly more important, but I do not need to invalidate germ theory to do so, just to put it in it rightful place. The entire human endeavor of phenomenal objectification the last few hundred years, scientific materialism, is a double blind experiment leading to tremendous distortions in reality perception that are sometimes useful, but for the most part increasingly disastrous.
Thanks for the space and prompt for my own further work - really helpful!
I had a discussion in the comments section of Sasha Latypova's Substack about the Open World Assumption and its implication for the questions.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/moderna-revises-2025-revenue-forecast/comment/86251555
also
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/moderna-revises-2025-revenue-forecast/comment/86306289
Be careful not to wait too long, or I might enter guesses for your answers!
1) Supports Trump Y
2) Trump assassination attempt faked N
3) Trump is a Technocrat ?
4) mRNA is a bioweapon. It is poison
5)All vaccines are bioweapons. Each has its own risk-benefit equation and would you ask are all drugs bioweapons? They should not be lumped together as each is very different from the rest and some people need some.
6) Vaccines were always bioweapons N
7) Covid was just poisoning. It was much more than that
8) Covid was a military operation. Military-political
9) Covid was dangerous. The virus killed people and the vaccine was even worse
10) Covid response was dangerous. Y
11) Covid was a pandemic. Depends on definition but yes it was an infectious disease that spread widely
12) Covid was a bioweapon. Probably SARS-CoV-2 was designed as a bioweapon
13) Viruses exist. Y
14) Viruses cause disease. Y
15) Terrain theory is correct. It is part of what needs to be considered
16) Germ theory is correct. Same
17) G3P is in charge
18) G3P runs Putin too
19) Global warming caused by humans. Not much
20) Supports Ukraine war. proxy war and resource war, so N
21) 5G is for depopulation ?
22) Chemtrails are for depopulation. Unclear what this is for
23) Malthus was correct. N
24) The Earth is overpopulated. N
Thank you Dr. Nass!! 🙏🙏🙏
✅
from Jeffrey W. Massey (just moved this out from the pinned comment)
yes / no / no / ? / no / no / yes / ? / yes / yes / no / ? possibly / yes / ? / ? / yes / ? / ? / no / no / ? / ? / ? / yes
✅
from Cindy Sheehan (just moved this out from the pinned comment)
1) Supports Trump NO
2) Trump assassination attempt faked NO
3) Trump is a Technocrat NO
4) mRNA is a bioweapon YES
5)All vaccines are bioweapons PROBABLY
6) Vaccines were always bioweapons PROBABLY
7) Covid was just poisoning ?
8) Covid was a military operation PROBABLY
9) Covid was dangerous NO
10) Covid response was dangerous YES
11) Covid was a pandemic NO
12) Covid was a bioweapon MAYBE
13) Viruses exist MAYBE
14) Viruses cause disease MAYBE
15) Terrain theory is correct MAYBE
16) Germ theory is correct MAYBE
17) G3P is in charge MAYBE
18) G3P runs Putin too ?
19) Global warming caused by humans SMALL PART
20) Supports Ukraine war NO
21) 5G is for depopulation YES
22) Chemtrails are for depopulation MAYBE
23) Malthus was correct NO
24) The Earth is overpopulated NO
I am conflicted, because, I am usually not an either/or; yes/no; person. There are many nuances. For example the chemtrail thing. I think it's for weather control that can have a big impact on the population. But directly? I don't think so.
✅
Some comment threads that help explain motivation:
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/robert-reich-continues-to-blow-up/comment/86737915
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/what-exactly-is-a-contrarian/comment/86803953
from Sasha Latypova:
1-3 - I neither "support" nor "don't support" Trump, I believe he is an unprincipled liar.
I find it is futile to exert my mind or emotions on figuring out the moves of an unprincipled liar. He will do whatever he is paid to do at that point in time as someone offers a better deal. So "support/non-support" is an exercise of guessing who is paying him for what when.
4-8 yes
9 - no
10- yes
11 - no
12 - no, but some chemical weapons were probably used, at least in some places
13- I don't care, it's a matter of personal beliefs
14 - no
15 - 16 - A "theory" is never "correct". It's a hypothesis that requires continuous investigation. I can say correct/incorrect about some specific claim/experiment. By the way, we are in the fking mess that we are because a group of people decided that some scientific theories were "correct" and therefore "settled".
17-18 I don't know what G3P means. My opinion on Putin is the same as my opinion on Trump.
19 - 22 no
23 - technically, yes, but nobody who talks about Malthus today actually read Malthus. I suggest that you read his essay on population. He did not say anything about overpopulation, nor projected an overpopulation of the Earth.
24 - no, not even close.
✅
Hello
1 - No
2 - yes
3 - yes
4 - yes
5 - yes
6 - yes
7 - yes
8 - yes
9 - no
10 - no
11 - no
12 - yes
13 - yes
14 - sometimes
15 - 80% yes
16 - 20% yes
17 - what is G3P?
18 - What/who is G3P (Putin is a Globalist puppet FYI)
19 - no
20 - no
21 - likely
22 - likely
23 - no!
24 - no!
Organizational Chart, Bank for International Settlements Kill Box
Organizational chart by Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic and What is the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)?
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/organizational-chart-bank-for-international
Oh fuck shit, ah, then 17 is a hard yes, and 18 is a yes too!
✅
I just recently became aware of your Newsletter and this questionnaire. I have a number of questions and some comments that I think it is best to place in separate responses. Here's one that is apropos to the above:
Would it be correct to say that what you refer to as G3P is another term for Globalist Cabal, (what Catherine Austin Fitts refers to as "Mr. Global.")? Other terms for Globalist Cabal (Globalist in short-hand) include Illuminati or Deep State, although the latter usually refers to those within a country who carry out the orders of unseen/unknown Globalists, but it can refer to the aggregate entity as well).
Glad you found the newsletter.
These questions follow the Open World Assumption:
"The Open World Assumption (OWA) is the assumption that what is not known to be true or false might be true, or absence of information is interpreted as unknown information, not as negative information"
So an assertion of one thing in the list does not negate the assertion of another thing. People will have different interpretations of different things.
I added this clarification to the instructions in the pinned comment.
Oh super, thank you!! 🙏🙏🙏
Sorry Doc Malik, but I want to be sure. You say
1) Supports Trump --- no
2) Trump assassination attempt faked --- yes
3) Trump is a Technocrat --- yes
4) mRNA is a bioweapon --- yes
5)All vaccines are bioweapons --- yes
6) Vaccines were always bioweapons --- yes
7) Covid was just poisoning --- yes
8) Covid was a military operation --- yes
9) Covid was dangerous --- no
10) Covid response was dangerous --- no
11) Covid was a pandemic --- no
12) Covid was a bioweapon --- yes
13) Viruses exist --- yes
14) Viruses cause disease --- sometimes
15) Terrain theory is correct --- 80% yes
16) Germ theory is correct --- 20% yes
17) G3P is in charge --- ?
18) G3P runs Putin too --- ?
19) Global warming caused by humans --- no
20) Supports Ukraine war --- no
21) 5G is for depopulation --- likely
22) Chemtrails are for depopulation --- likely
23) Malthus was correct --- no!
24) The Earth is overpopulated --- no!
✅
Thanks for checking
10 - yes
what is G3P?
Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) according to I. Davis.
He also asked here,
https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/more-opinions-on-wedge-issues/comment/85284914
and I explained it 6 days ago.
✅
I would be interested to see what these folks think about bio-digital convergence.
Thanks for the suggestion, I will consider it.
Its a problem updating the questions because the respondents seem already to be nervous about committing themselves to answers, even though the Open World Assumption is used for the answers as explained in the instructions.
Understandable
I actually judge people by a list similar to this.
I would like to see you define what you mean by Technocrat. For example, one of the questions asks if DJT is a technocrat. I could see asking if he is a globalist which is not necessarily the same thing, although technocracy and the use of advanced forms of technology are clearly part of the means that Globalists utilize in achieving their goals.
see https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/more-opinions-on-wedge-issues/comment/85967640