39 Comments

Note: for anyone who is a respondent in the table, your row can be filled out by entering a comment using the following template with answers of <yes/ yes (see comments) / no / no (see comments) / ?> where any comments can be here in the comments section, then I will put your answers in the table. Thank you for participating! --YAT

These questions follow the Open World Assumption:

"The Open World Assumption (OWA) is the assumption that what is not known to be true or false might be true, or absence of information is interpreted as unknown information, not as negative information"

So an assertion of one thing in the list does not negate the assertion of another thing. People will have different interpretations of different things.

Be careful not to wait too long, or I might enter guesses for your answers!

1) Supports Trump

2) Trump assassination attempt faked

3) Trump is a Technocrat

4) mRNA is a bioweapon

5)All vaccines are bioweapons

6) Vaccines were always bioweapons

7) Covid was just poisoning

8) Covid was a military operation

9) Covid was dangerous

10) Covid response was dangerous

11) Covid was a pandemic

12) Covid was a bioweapon

13) Viruses exist

14) Viruses cause disease

15) Terrain theory is correct

16) Germ theory is correct

17) G3P is in charge

18) G3P runs Putin too

19) Global warming caused by humans

20) Supports Ukraine war

21) 5G is for depopulation

22) Chemtrails are for depopulation

23) Malthus was correct

24) The Earth is overpopulated

Expand full comment

1) Supports Trump NO

2) Trump assassination attempt faked NO

3) Trump is a Technocrat NO

4) mRNA is a bioweapon YES

5)All vaccines are bioweapons PROBABLY

6) Vaccines were always bioweapons PROBABLY

7) Covid was just poisoning ?

8) Covid was a military operation PROBABLY

9) Covid was dangerous NO

10) Covid response was dangerous YES

11) Covid was a pandemic NO

12) Covid was a bioweapon MAYBE

13) Viruses exist MAYBE

14) Viruses cause disease MAYBE

15) Terrain theory is correct MAYBE

16) Germ theory is correct MAYBE

17) G3P is in charge MAYBE

18) G3P runs Putin too ?

19) Global warming caused by humans SMALL PART

20) Supports Ukraine war NO

21) 5G is for depopulation YES

22) Chemtrails are for depopulation MAYBE

23) Malthus was correct NO

24) The Earth is overpopulated NO

I am conflicted, because, I am usually not an either/or; yes/no; person. There are many nuances. For example the chemtrail thing. I think it's for weather control that can have a big impact on the population. But directly? I don't think so.

Expand full comment

from the previous chart version post, you said

"... I do think the assassination attempt on Trump was real, just a psyop, though. I believe in the germ and the terrain theories---and I don't support Trump, but, I am SOOOOO glad that Kamala didn't win!"

Expand full comment

You can add info here in the comments and I'll enter i.e. yes (see comments) or no (see comments).

For your MAYBEs, I put 'yes (see comments)' instead of '?'. I did that because you put '?' for other things. No problem if you want me to change those back to '?'.

Thank you Cindy, I really appreciate it!! 🙏🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment

To assist you I have restacked and tagged some of the people whose data is unknown so far.

Here is mine:

1) I do not support Trump

2) I think the assassination attempts were faked.

3) Trump is a technocrat.

4) mRNA is a bio-weapon

5) All vaccines are bio-weapons

6) Not sure

Thanks for expanding your project to include a wider variety of Substackers. Much appreciated. xx

Expand full comment

Datawrapper doesn't make the horizontal scroll obvious. There are a lot more questions 😁

Expand full comment

Thank you! I will add it.

-Oh- I was worried people wouldn't see that they can scroll the questions, please try if you didn't see that.

Expand full comment

Oh crikey! That did escape my attention! OK - wow 24 questions??... this is very awkward. I need two copies of the post and have to keep swapping between the two!

🤣😂Ain't nobody got time for this!🤣😂

7) NO Covid was not just poisoning

8) NO Covid was not a military action

9) YES Covid was dangerous

10) YES Covid response was dangerous

11) NO Covid was not a pandemic

12) YES Covid was type of bioweapon - 5G

13) NO viruses do not exist

14) NO viruses do not cause disease

15) YES Terrain theory is correct

16) NO Germ theory is not correct

17) NO G3P is not in charge

18) NO G3P does not 'run' Putin.

19) NO Global warming is not caused by humans

20) NO I do not support ANY war

21) YES 5G is for depop + surveillance + IoT + Great Reset + 4th Industrial Revolution

22) YES Chemtrails are for depop + destruction of all natural life

23) NO Malthus was very short sighted!

24) NO the earth is not over-populated

Expand full comment

🙏🙏🙏 Thank you!

You can see why I'm limiting it to a few people.

Expand full comment

more people can always be added later

one at a time 😁

Expand full comment

It is a lot bigger than I realised!

Expand full comment

updated ✅

Expand full comment

Note: relevant comments will be copied over from previous version, which is at https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/opinions-on-wedge-issues

Expand full comment

My name isn't on it?

Expand full comment

not sure what you mean, but I added

https://tomg2021.substack.com/p/more-opinions-on-wedge-issues/comment/85674538

which seemed the only relevant thing from the previous post. You can always just add more comments here.

If you don't see your row on the first page, go to page 2.

Expand full comment

1. Supports Trump - No, but prays for him.

2. Trump assassination attempt faked - Yes

3. Trump is a technocrat - Yes, and other things too.

4. mRNA is a bioweapon - Yes

5. All vaccines are bioweapons - Yes

6. Vaccines were always bioweapons - Yes

7. Covid was just poisoning - Yes

8. Covid was a military operation - Yes

9. Covid was dangerous - Yes. Deceit and poisoning are harmful.

10. Covid response was dangerous - Yes. Deceit and poisoning are harmful.

11. Covid was a pandemic - No

12. Covid was a bioweapon - Yes, and psychological deceit operation.

13. Viruses exist - Yes, if 'virus' defined as infinite variety of unstable/dynamic biologically-active substances produced by living organisms. [No if defined as stable, transmissible disease-causing agents.]

14. Viruses cause disease - No. See response to 13, above and my other writing on the subject.

15. Terrain theory is correct - No position. Awaiting further development of hypotheses and evidence. My distrust of available definitions, scientific papers and concern about intentionally-misleading information are high.

16. Germ theory is correct - No position. Awaiting further development of hypotheses and evidence. My distrust of available definitions, scientific papers and concern about intentionally-misleading information are high.

17. G3P is in charge - Yes

18. G3P runs Putin too - Yes

19. Global warming caused by humans - No.

I don't think global warming is a real thing. Re: global warming and weather control theory: I don't think TPTB control the weather as much as I think they control public perception of weather, and management (long-planned exploitation) of mostly natural disasters that they can predict (broadly speaking) may -- within margins of probability -- hit each place on earth. For example, I think they can start fires in dry areas, if the areas are dry, just as any arsonist can, but they probably have better equipment for starting more fires, faster, hotter and more selectively in more locations throughout a dry region simultaneously (i.e. Paradise, Lahaina, Palisades, directed-energy weapons etc.). I think they can arrange mass poisonings, chemical sprays, chemical spills, chemical plant explosions (i.e. East Palestine, Atlanta...) and vaccination campaigns, and they can arrange the false attribution of resulting biological effects (sickness) to illusory/false causes other than chemical poisonings (such as transmissible viruses). They can arrange demolition of skyscrapers, bridges, planes, dams and levees. They can send mercenaries into flood and fire ravaged areas after floods happen and block people from mutual support and recovery and drive people off their land and seize land, homes and businesses. I think they can and have identified (decades ago, long before any specific disaster strikes), what they will do in every inhabited place, during and after the disaster hits, to weaken and kill survivors, drive survivors away, snap up real property and prevent resettlement. But I don't think they can conjure rainfall or hurricanes, or withhold rainfall that would otherwise happen (so as to conjure drought.) I think they want people to think they have those techniques. But I don't think they really have them. I think it's another example of projected illusions to deflect attention from traditional and DEW arson, demolition, chemical poisoning, looting and other forms of intentional destruction and exploitation of post-disaster chaos. ADDITION Jan. 13, 2025: And they can arrange the false attribution of the fires to drought, high winds, too much dried out vegetation, too much human population, global warming, etc.

20. Supports Ukraine war - No

21. 5G is for depopulation - Undecided, leaning No.

I tend to think 5G, 4G, 3G and other (novel or renamed old) EMF sources are useful for 1) wasting human time and material resources (construction projects with no real benefit or improvement over existing tech); 2) frightening people/inducing sense of helplessness about potential sources of harm they cannot readily see or avoid; and 3) deflecting attention away from global theft (looting/hoarding of land and resources) and from chemical poisoning (drugs, low-altitude outdoor and indoor/interior-of-building sprays, derailments, explosions) and vaccination as primary causes of sickness.

22. Chemtrails are for depopulation - Undecided, leaning No.

I tend to think high-altitude chemtrails are possibly spraying seawater in most cases and useful for 1) wasting human time and material resources (aviation planes, drones, fuels); 2) scaring people/inducing sense of helplessness about potential sources of harm they can readily see but cannot readily avoid; 3) making the act of looking up into the sky become psychologically distressing rather than joyful, reassuring, calming and/or reverent; and 4) deflecting attention from global theft (looting/hoarding of land and resources) and from chemical poisoning (drugs, low-altitude or surface outdoor and indoor/interior-of-building sprays, derailments, explosions) and vaccination as primary causes of sickness.

23. Malthus was correct - No.

24. The Earth is overpopulated - No, and population and land/resource use/carrying-capacity data are just as false as all other centrally-controlled data.

Expand full comment

Thank you Katherine!! 🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment

You're welcome! Thank you for putting the project together.

Expand full comment

I'm not a «well-known commentator» but here you go:

-

Supports Trump: partially

Trump assassination attempt faked: no

Trump is a technocrat: yes

mRNA is a bioweapon: no

All vaccines are bioweapons: no

Vaccines were always bioweapons: no

Covid was just poisoning: partially

Covid was a military operation: partially

Covid was dangerous: no

Covid response was dangerous: yes

Covid was a pandemic: yes

Covid was a bioweapon: partially

Viruses exist: yes

Viruses cause disease: partially

Terrain theory is correct: partially

Germ theory is correct: partially

G3P is in charge: partially

G3P runs Putin, too: no

Global warming caused by humans: no

Supports Ukraine war: no

5G is for depopulation: no

Chemtrails are for depopulation: no

Malthus was correct: no

The Earth is overpopulated: no

-

Some comments:

- I believe one of the biggest issues in public discussion these days is many folks' inability to distinguish between necessary cause and sufficient cause.

- I subscribe to the «viruses are just pieces of trash» which means their presence can shape the course of disease but in most cases aren't sufficient to cause it.

- I believe covid was a mostly unsuccessful attempt to create a bioweapon, and the overreaction was caused in large part by Wuhan folks overreporting their success.

- and most importantly, I believe most humans don't see very far. ;)

Expand full comment

1) Supports Trump --- no

2) Trump assassination attempt faked --- Probably

3) Trump is a Technocrat --- yes

4) mRNA is a bioweapon --- yes

5)All vaccines are bioweapons --- Probably

6) Vaccines were always bioweapons --- Probably

7) Covid was just poisoning --- Probably

8) Covid was a military operation --- yes

9) Covid was dangerous --- no

10) Covid response was dangerous --- Yes

11) Covid was a pandemic --- no

12) Covid was a bioweapon --- yes

13) Viruses exist --- Not with contagion as an element

14) Viruses cause disease --- No

15) Terrain theory is correct --- Yes

16) Germ theory is correct --- No

17) G3P is in charge --- Probably

18) G3P runs Putin too --- Not sure

19) Global warming caused by humans --- no

20) Supports Ukraine war --- no

21) 5G is for depopulation --- yes

22) Chemtrails are for depopulation --- probably

23) Malthus was correct --- no!

24) The Earth is overpopulated --- no!

Expand full comment

Thank you Amy!! 🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment

Be careful not to wait too long, or I might enter guesses for your answers!

1) Supports Trump Y

2) Trump assassination attempt faked N

3) Trump is a Technocrat ?

4) mRNA is a bioweapon. It is poison

5)All vaccines are bioweapons. Each has its own risk-benefit equation and would you ask are all drugs bioweapons? They should not be lumped together as each is very different from the rest and some people need some.

6) Vaccines were always bioweapons N

7) Covid was just poisoning. It was much more than that

8) Covid was a military operation. Military-political

9) Covid was dangerous. The virus killed people and the vaccine was even worse

10) Covid response was dangerous. Y

11) Covid was a pandemic. Depends on definition but yes it was an infectious disease that spread widely

12) Covid was a bioweapon. Probably SARS-CoV-2 was designed as a bioweapon

13) Viruses exist. Y

14) Viruses cause disease. Y

15) Terrain theory is correct. It is part of what needs to be considered

16) Germ theory is correct. Same

17) G3P is in charge

18) G3P runs Putin too

19) Global warming caused by humans. Not much

20) Supports Ukraine war. proxy war and resource war, so N

21) 5G is for depopulation ?

22) Chemtrails are for depopulation. Unclear what this is for

23) Malthus was correct. N

24) The Earth is overpopulated. N

Expand full comment

Thank you Dr. Nass!! 🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment

Hello

1 - No

2 - yes

3 - yes

4 - yes

5 - yes

6 - yes

7 - yes

8 - yes

9 - no

10 - no

11 - no

12 - yes

13 - yes

14 - sometimes

15 - 80% yes

16 - 20% yes

17 - what is G3P?

18 - What/who is G3P (Putin is a Globalist puppet FYI)

19 - no

20 - no

21 - likely

22 - likely

23 - no!

24 - no!

Expand full comment

Organizational Chart, Bank for International Settlements Kill Box

Organizational chart by Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic and What is the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)?

https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/organizational-chart-bank-for-international

Expand full comment

Oh fuck shit, ah, then 17 is a hard yes, and 18 is a yes too!

Expand full comment

Expand full comment

I just recently became aware of your Newsletter and this questionnaire. I have a number of questions and some comments that I think it is best to place in separate responses. Here's one that is apropos to the above:

Would it be correct to say that what you refer to as G3P is another term for Globalist Cabal, (what Catherine Austin Fitts refers to as "Mr. Global.")? Other terms for Globalist Cabal (Globalist in short-hand) include Illuminati or Deep State, although the latter usually refers to those within a country who carry out the orders of unseen/unknown Globalists, but it can refer to the aggregate entity as well).

Expand full comment

Glad you found the newsletter.

These questions follow the Open World Assumption:

"The Open World Assumption (OWA) is the assumption that what is not known to be true or false might be true, or absence of information is interpreted as unknown information, not as negative information"

So an assertion of one thing in the list does not negate the assertion of another thing. People will have different interpretations of different things.

Expand full comment

I added this clarification to the instructions in the pinned comment.

Expand full comment

Oh super, thank you!! 🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment

Sorry Doc Malik, but I want to be sure. You say

1) Supports Trump --- no

2) Trump assassination attempt faked --- yes

3) Trump is a Technocrat --- yes

4) mRNA is a bioweapon --- yes

5)All vaccines are bioweapons --- yes

6) Vaccines were always bioweapons --- yes

7) Covid was just poisoning --- yes

8) Covid was a military operation --- yes

9) Covid was dangerous --- no

10) Covid response was dangerous --- no

11) Covid was a pandemic --- no

12) Covid was a bioweapon --- yes

13) Viruses exist --- yes

14) Viruses cause disease --- sometimes

15) Terrain theory is correct --- 80% yes

16) Germ theory is correct --- 20% yes

17) G3P is in charge --- ?

18) G3P runs Putin too --- ?

19) Global warming caused by humans --- no

20) Supports Ukraine war --- no

21) 5G is for depopulation --- likely

22) Chemtrails are for depopulation --- likely

23) Malthus was correct --- no!

24) The Earth is overpopulated --- no!

Expand full comment

Thanks for checking

10 - yes

what is G3P?

Expand full comment

Expand full comment

I actually judge people by a list similar to this.

Expand full comment

I would like to see you define what you mean by Technocrat. For example, one of the questions asks if DJT is a technocrat. I could see asking if he is a globalist which is not necessarily the same thing, although technocracy and the use of advanced forms of technology are clearly part of the means that Globalists utilize in achieving their goals.

Expand full comment

Amazing how there is no consensus!.

Expand full comment

That was not expected or intended.

Its not intended to be a party line or a struggle session.

The questions are intentionally chosen to be controversial but relevant.

Its potentially helpful in locating unexpected areas of agreement.

Expand full comment