Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yet Another Tommy's avatar

In this post I make reference to Meryl Nass, and my thinking on her evolves, see

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-25/comment/123889530

note on thread linked above:

Suavek banned me and deleted my comment:

-------

Wow, Suavek, I'm not a propagandist. You've got me wrong.

-edit-

And nobody pays or controls me.

-------

In that thread, Suavek subsequently asks me rhetorical questions but had already banned me, so I have no way of answering.

Expand full comment
Blue Electric Storm's avatar

As I've spent the past week bemoaning the overarching rule of the Machine, I have to wonder.

What will it require to be willing to give it all up and be on the earth naturally again?

Technology has been sold, in one aspect, as that which is "safer" than nature, because, simply, a human thinks he controls it.

In realizing we are controlled by it, what will be the response?

How do we accomplish "the absence of the abuser"?

The technology doesn't create and run itself. There is always human agency behind it.

If it is proved beyond doubt that people's monthly cell-irradiating "phones/weapons" are financing the 5G warfare, will people give up their phones?

I very much want to read that article about Vietnam, thanks for that. And all the links.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts